FICS vs. AVGV
FICS (First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF) and AVGV (Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FICS is passively managed, while AVGV is actively managed. Over the past year, FICS returned 14.11% vs 45.34% for AVGV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FICS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for AVGV.
Performance
FICS vs. AVGV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than AVGV's 11.91% return.
FICS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 45.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FICS vs. AVGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 3.23% | 20.44% | 2.59% | 5.64% |
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF | 11.91% | 22.57% | 11.26% | 11.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICS and AVGV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FICS and AVGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICS vs. AVGV — Risk / Return Rank
FICS
AVGV
FICS vs. AVGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FICS | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 3.43 | -2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 4.72 | -3.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.62 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 6.15 | -4.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 24.23 | -18.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FICS | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 3.43 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.40 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
FICS vs. AVGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, which is greater than AVGV's maximum drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and AVGV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICS | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.16% | -17.03% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -8.12% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -0.46% | -2.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -2.39% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.06% | +1.23% |
Volatility
FICS vs. AVGV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) at 5.31%. This indicates that FICS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FICS | AVGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.31% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 10.05% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 13.36% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 15.11% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 15.11% | +1.84% |
FICS vs. AVGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGV's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
FICS vs. AVGV - Dividend Comparison
FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than AVGV's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICS First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF | 1.91% | 1.85% | 2.01% | 1.02% | 1.89% | 1.26% |
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.97% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |