FICCX vs. JNEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) and JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX).
FICCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007. JNEMX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on Dec 1, 2010.
Performance
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICCX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I | 2.82% | 25.83% | 9.14% | 14.69% | -6.12% | 26.90% | 4.50% | 25.89% | -14.30% | 12.85% |
JNEMX JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 | 2.91% | 26.14% | 1.62% | 18.11% | -19.44% | 11.92% | 13.42% | 27.95% | -17.69% | 30.04% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FICCX having a 2.82% return and JNEMX slightly higher at 2.91%. Over the past 10 years, FICCX has outperformed JNEMX with an annualized return of 10.46%, while JNEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.87% annualized return.
FICCX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
JNEMX
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 2.91%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FICCX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than JNEMX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FICCX vs. JNEMX — Risk / Return Rank
FICCX
JNEMX
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) and JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FICCX | JNEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.09 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 1.54 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.61 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.66 | 6.05 | +5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FICCX | JNEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.09 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.39 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.52 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.39 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FICCX and JNEMX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Dividend Comparison
FICCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than JNEMX's 6.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICCX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I | 4.47% | 4.59% | 7.72% | 3.36% | 4.12% | 5.22% | 2.47% | 4.31% | 7.38% | 0.89% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
JNEMX JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 | 6.52% | 6.71% | 3.27% | 2.40% | 2.88% | 6.89% | 1.30% | 3.65% | 3.93% | 1.83% | 2.03% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICCX drawdown since its inception was -58.09%, which is greater than JNEMX's maximum drawdown of -34.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICCX and JNEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICCX | JNEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.09% | -34.13% | -23.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -11.62% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.00% | -33.05% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.84% | -34.13% | -5.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -6.72% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -8.27% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 3.09% | -0.78% |
Volatility
FICCX vs. JNEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class I (FICCX) is 4.78%, while JPMorgan International Equity Fund Class R6 (JNEMX) has a volatility of 7.57%. This indicates that FICCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FICCX | JNEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 7.57% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.39% | 11.52% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 17.10% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 16.58% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 17.20% | +0.30% |