FIBR vs. BYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIBR (iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF) and BYLD (iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds from iShares - FIBR tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index while BYLD tracks the Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIBR returned 2.28%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for BYLD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIBR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BYLD.

Performance

FIBR vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIBR achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FIBR has underperformed BYLD with an annualized return of 2.28%, while BYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.01% annualized return.

FIBR

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 2.28%

BYLD

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 1.23%
• 6M: 1.35%
• 1Y: 7.01%
• 3Y*: 6.49%
• 5Y*: 2.21%
• 10Y*: 3.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIBR vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF	0.06%	8.32%	6.04%	8.22%	-13.57%	-1.00%	3.31%	10.03%	-0.93%	3.89%
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF	1.23%	8.41%	4.17%	8.30%	-10.33%	-1.25%	4.25%	12.79%	-1.50%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FIBR and BYLD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015	0.64

The correlation between FIBR and BYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIBR vs. BYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FIBR	BYLD
Energy	100.0%	99.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FIBR vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIBR

FIBR Risk / Return Rank: 38
FIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BYLD

BYLD Risk / Return Rank: 55
BYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIBR vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIBR	BYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.85	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.76	-0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	2.60	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.50	10.54	-5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIBR vs. BYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the BYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIBR and BYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIBR	BYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.85	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.43	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.56	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.57	-0.07

Drawdowns

FIBR vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIBR drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, which is greater than BYLD's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIBR and BYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIBR	BYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.47%	-14.75%	-3.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.99%	-2.71%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.08%	-3.94%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.47%	-14.65%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.47%	-14.75%	-3.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-0.34%	-1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-2.51%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.67%	+0.30%

Volatility

FIBR vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIBR	BYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	1.42%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	2.94%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.80%	3.82%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	5.20%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	5.43%	-0.48%

FIBR vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIBR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIBR vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison

FIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than BYLD's 5.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BYLD iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF	5.36%	5.32%	5.31%	4.45%	3.39%	2.18%	3.41%	3.67%	4.22%	3.22%	3.14%	3.37%
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF	4.62%	4.78%	5.04%	4.44%	3.27%	1.92%	2.57%	3.27%	3.61%	2.74%	2.92%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIBR and BYLD in my portfolio?

FIBR and BYLD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIBR or BYLD?

BYLD has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FIBR (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIBR dropped -18.47% vs BYLD's -14.75%.

Which ETF is better, FIBR or BYLD?

On 10-year performance, BYLD leads with 3.01% vs 2.28% for FIBR. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIBR or BYLD?

Over the 10-year period, BYLD has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIBR or BYLD?

BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FIBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIBR or BYLD?

BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 4.62% for FIBR.

What is the main difference between FIBR and BYLD?

FIBR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index, while BYLD tracks Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FIBR and 0.17% for BYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.