PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIBPX vs. VTILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Bond Strategy Portfolio (FIBPX) and Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund (VTILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIBPX having a 1.10% return and VTILX slightly higher at 1.11%.


FIBPX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.26%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.55%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
2.08%

VTILX

1D
0.04%
1M
1.05%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.50%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIBPX
Federated Hermes International Bond Strategy Portfolio
1.10%11.18%2.89%8.33%-16.87%-3.53%
VTILX
Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund
1.11%2.96%3.91%8.85%-13.01%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FIBPX and VTILX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.60

The correlation between FIBPX and VTILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIBPX vs. VTILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIBPX
FIBPX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FIBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FIBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VTILX
VTILX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VTILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTILX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VTILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTILX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Bond Strategy Portfolio (FIBPX) and Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund (VTILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIBPXVTILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

0.81

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

2.23

+1.40

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the VTILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIBPX and VTILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIBPX drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than VTILX's maximum drawdown of -15.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIBPX and VTILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIBPXVTILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-15.85%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.82%

-2.90%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.60%

-2.90%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-15.85%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.76%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.86%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

1.06%

+0.42%

Volatility

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes International Bond Strategy Portfolio (FIBPX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund (VTILX) at 1.03%. This indicates that FIBPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIBPXVTILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.03%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.22%

2.64%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42%

3.08%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

4.46%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

4.36%

+1.62%

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIBPX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VTILX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIBPX vs. VTILX - Dividend Comparison

FIBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than VTILX's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIBPX
Federated Hermes International Bond Strategy Portfolio
5.20%5.26%5.37%3.61%0.00%5.00%2.08%3.45%4.39%2.79%4.61%
VTILX
Vanguard Total International Bond II Index Fund
4.34%4.27%4.52%4.22%0.94%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIBPX and VTILX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIBPX has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to VTILX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIBPX dropped -29.22% vs VTILX's -15.85%.

FIBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIBPX and VTILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer