FIAX vs. DUKZ
FIAX (Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FIAX returned 4.66% vs 8.21% for DUKZ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.
Performance
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIAX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than DUKZ's 2.53% return.
FIAX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKZ
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FIAX Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF | 1.22% | 2.33% | 2.03% |
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 2.53% | 4.24% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIAX and DUKZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FIAX and DUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIAX
DUKZ
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FIAX
DUKZ
Financial Services
FIAX
DUKZ
-
Communication Services
FIAX
DUKZ
Consumer Cyclical
FIAX
DUKZ
Healthcare
FIAX
DUKZ
Industrials
FIAX
DUKZ
Consumer Defensive
FIAX
DUKZ
-
Energy
FIAX
DUKZ
-
Utilities
FIAX
DUKZ
Real Estate
FIAX
DUKZ
-
Basic Materials
FIAX
DUKZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIAX vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
FIAX
DUKZ
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIAX | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.43 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 9.00 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIAX | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.92 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.18 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIAX drawdown since its inception was -6.26%, which is greater than DUKZ's maximum drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAX and DUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIAX | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -4.70% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -3.39% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.54% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -1.14% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.91% | -0.25% |
Volatility
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) is 1.43%, while Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that FIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIAX | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.94% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 3.62% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 4.30% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 4.30% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 4.30% | -0.25% |
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIAX vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison
FIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than DUKZ's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 3.79% | 4.05% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
FIAX Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF | 8.19% | 8.17% | 8.11% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIAX and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUKZ has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to FIAX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAX dropped -6.26% vs DUKZ's -4.70%.
On 1-year performance, DUKZ leads with 8.21% vs 4.66% for FIAX. On fees, DUKZ is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, FIAX has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DUKZ has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUKZ is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for FIAX.
FIAX has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 3.79% for DUKZ.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for FIAX and 1.03% for DUKZ.
DUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIAX and DUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer