FIAT vs. OMAH
FIAT (YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FIAT returned -0.18% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. FIAT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
FIAT vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIAT achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.
FIAT
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- 16.99%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIAT vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 13.84% | -27.93% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIAT and OMAH is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | -0.31 |
The correlation between FIAT and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (all time) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIAT vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
FIAT
OMAH
FIAT vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIAT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.82 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 9.48 | -9.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIAT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 1.43 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.70 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
FIAT vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIAT drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAT and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIAT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -11.83% | -58.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.26% | -3.00% | -39.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.94% | -2.65% | -48.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -1.26% | -44.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.32% | 1.21% | +26.11% |
Volatility
FIAT vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that FIAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIAT | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 1.93% | +13.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.03% | 5.49% | +36.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.49% | 8.05% | +47.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.56% | 13.21% | +47.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.56% | 13.21% | +47.35% |
FIAT vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIAT vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
FIAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 93.28%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIAT YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 93.28% | 178.11% | 70.99% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIAT and OMAH have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIAT has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAT dropped -70.50% vs OMAH's -11.83%.
On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs -0.18% for FIAT. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FIAT.
FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 93.28%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FIAT and 0.95% for OMAH.
OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIAT and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer