PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIASX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class A (FIASX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIASX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 6.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FIASX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.02%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.05% annualized return.


FIASX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.84%
6M
1.12%
YTD
5.42%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
5.42%
10Y*
8.02%
ALL TIME*
11.11%

FCNTX

1D
1.21%
1M
-2.67%
6M
4.74%
YTD
6.89%
1Y
15.13%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
17.05%
ALL TIME*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIASX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class A
5.42%24.33%-0.23%19.32%-16.90%13.15%9.63%21.14%-16.35%31.47%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
6.89%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIASX and FCNTX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002

0.63

The correlation between FIASX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIASX
FCNTX

Industrials

23.1%
7.7%

Financial Services

15.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
11.3%

Technology

9.8%
32.7%

Basic Materials

9.8%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
3.6%

Healthcare

6.7%
8.7%

Real Estate

5.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

4.1%
19.6%

Energy

3.6%
3.1%

Utilities

0.7%
0.1%

Industrials

FIASX
23.1%
FCNTX
7.7%

Financial Services

FIASX
15.8%
FCNTX
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FIASX
11.4%
FCNTX
11.3%

Technology

FIASX
9.8%
FCNTX
32.7%

Basic Materials

FIASX
9.8%
FCNTX
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

FIASX
9.4%
FCNTX
3.6%

Healthcare

FIASX
6.7%
FCNTX
8.7%

Real Estate

FIASX
5.6%
FCNTX
0.1%

Communication Services

FIASX
4.1%
FCNTX
19.6%

Energy

FIASX
3.6%
FCNTX
3.1%

Utilities

FIASX
0.7%
FCNTX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIASX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIASX
FIASX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class A (FIASX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIASXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.64

4.43

-0.79

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIASX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIASX drawdown since its inception was -60.99%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIASX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIASXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.99%

-49.19%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-11.30%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.80%

-19.75%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.25%

-32.59%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-32.59%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-4.14%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-8.14%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.91%

+0.42%

Volatility

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class A (FIASX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 4.09%. This indicates that FIASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIASXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

4.09%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

12.28%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

15.50%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

19.37%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

19.74%

-5.80%

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIASX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIASX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than FCNTX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.37%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FIASX
Fidelity Advisor International Small Cap Fund Class A
3.24%3.41%2.40%1.67%0.42%7.18%0.56%2.11%5.95%2.51%2.46%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIASX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIASX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to FCNTX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIASX dropped -60.99% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIASX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer