FIAGX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIAGX (Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FIAGX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FIAGX returned 8.87%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIAGX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A (FIAGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIAGX achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FIAGX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.

FIAGX

• 1D: 3.82%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 1Y: 14.38%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 4.55%
• 10Y*: 8.87%
• ALL TIME*: 5.67%

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: 3.61%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 22.98%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 16.85%
• ALL TIME*: 13.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FIAGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIAGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A	7.33%	17.57%	4.65%	20.53%	-23.44%	15.12%	16.61%	33.58%	-11.75%	28.80%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	5.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIAGX and FCNTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2007	0.81

The correlation between FIAGX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIAGX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIAGX

FIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 18
FIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A (FIAGX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIAGX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.87	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	1.29	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.16	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.19	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.21	4.65	-1.44

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIAGX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIAGX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAGX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIAGX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.17%	-49.19%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-11.30%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-19.75%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	-32.59%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	-32.59%	-2.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-5.29%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.56%	-8.14%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	2.89%	+1.20%

Volatility

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A (FIAGX) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.84%. This indicates that FIAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIAGX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	3.84%	+3.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.31%	12.26%	+6.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	15.46%	+5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.60%	19.37%	-0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.90%	19.73%	-1.83%

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIAGX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIAGX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than FCNTX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.42%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FIAGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class A	2.99%	3.21%	0.49%	0.19%	1.46%	1.68%	0.00%	0.73%	0.60%	0.12%	0.96%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIAGX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FIAGX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIAGX or FCNTX?

FIAGX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FCNTX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAGX dropped -56.17% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.