FHZDX vs. LTFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHZDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K) and LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHZDX returned 8.20%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for LTFIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHZDX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTFIX.

Performance

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K (FHZDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHZDX having a 10.15% return and LTFIX slightly lower at 9.67%.

FHZDX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 6M: 11.07%
• 1Y: 23.49%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: —

LTFIX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 11.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHZDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K	10.15%	18.47%	13.40%	17.66%	-18.23%	14.17%	16.91%	25.60%	-12.65%
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	9.67%	17.80%	17.28%	20.33%	-18.84%	17.73%	16.47%	27.27%	-13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FHZDX and LTFIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.95

The correlation between FHZDX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHZDX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHZDX

FHZDX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FHZDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FHZDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FHZDX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FHZDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FHZDX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

LTFIX

LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 49
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K (FHZDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHZDX	LTFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.97	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.78	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.36	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	2.68	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.92	12.06	+1.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHZDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHZDX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHZDX	LTFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	1.97	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.61	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.47	+0.22

Drawdowns

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHZDX drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHZDX and LTFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHZDX	LTFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.10%	-52.73%	+23.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-8.71%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.69%	-15.70%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.30%	-26.80%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-7.64%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.93%	-0.22%

Volatility

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K (FHZDX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHZDX	LTFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	3.34%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.97%	9.46%	-1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	11.84%	-2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.52%	15.46%	-2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.70%	15.84%	-1.14%

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHZDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHZDX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

FHZDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than LTFIX's 7.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHZDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K	3.62%	2.98%	4.79%	2.07%	5.75%	7.91%	4.88%	3.62%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	7.96%	8.73%	8.47%	4.17%	8.60%	5.83%	3.91%	6.03%	6.60%	3.51%	3.99%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHZDX and LTFIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FHZDX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHZDX or LTFIX?

FHZDX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to LTFIX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHZDX dropped -29.10% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHZDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.