FHYSX vs. XPTFX
FHYSX (Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio) and XPTFX (Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund) are both mutual funds - FHYSX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Federated, while XPTFX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, FHYSX returned 3.07%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for XPTFX. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FHYSX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for XPTFX.
Performance
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHYSX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 3.95% return.
FHYSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.44%
XPTFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 0.96% | 9.14% | 6.42% | 12.77% | -13.16% | 4.49% | 6.08% | 15.14% | -2.16% | 6.98% |
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 3.95% | 7.47% | 8.62% | 8.55% | 3.74% | 1.91% | 2.18% | 4.70% | 4.47% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHYSX and XPTFX is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHYSX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank
FHYSX
XPTFX
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHYSX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 4.11 | -2.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.68 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.39 | 11.56 | -1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHYSX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYSX and XPTFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHYSX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.45% | -2.95% | -18.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -1.96% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.64% | -2.95% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -2.95% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | 0.00% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -0.26% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.62% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) has a higher volatility of 0.53% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.21%. This indicates that FHYSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHYSX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 0.21% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 0.60% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 2.93% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 2.53% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 2.00% | +3.72% |
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHYSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHYSX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison
FHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, less than XPTFX's 6.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 5.84% | 6.28% | 5.84% | 5.30% | 5.27% | 4.54% | 5.74% | 6.18% | 6.61% | 6.98% | 6.45% | 8.45% |
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 6.03% | 7.24% | 6.78% | 6.66% | 5.70% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 4.62% | 4.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHYSX and XPTFX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHYSX has higher volatility (0.53%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYSX dropped -21.45% vs XPTFX's -2.95%.
XPTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHYSX and XPTFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer