PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYSX vs. RITGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYSX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than RITGX's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FHYSX has underperformed RITGX with an annualized return of 5.32%, while RITGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.38% annualized return.


FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.40%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
5.32%

RITGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.35%
6M
3.04%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
6.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.36%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.16%8.34%
RITGX
American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6
2.35%8.69%9.91%12.54%-10.10%8.74%7.44%12.28%-1.46%7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYSX and RITGX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FHYSX and RITGX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYSX vs. RITGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RITGX
RITGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYSXRITGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.61

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.75

4.62

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.60

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.95

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.96

17.93

-0.97

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the RITGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYSX and RITGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYSXRITGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.61

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.00

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.16

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.21

-0.33

Drawdowns

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYSX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, roughly equal to the maximum RITGX drawdown of -21.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYSX and RITGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSXRITGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-21.20%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-2.41%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-3.92%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-13.75%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

-21.20%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-2.23%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.53%

-0.06%

Volatility

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) is 0.98%, while American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6 (RITGX) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that FHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RITGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYSXRITGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.19%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.73%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41%

3.46%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

5.03%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

5.52%

+0.25%

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RITGX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHYSX vs. RITGX - Dividend Comparison

FHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than RITGX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.29%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
RITGX
American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class R-6
6.64%6.63%6.66%6.80%4.50%4.65%6.19%6.56%6.68%6.36%5.36%7.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHYSX and RITGX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RITGX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to FHYSX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYSX dropped -21.45% vs RITGX's -21.20%.

RITGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYSX and RITGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer