PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYSX vs. PIAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYSX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than PIAMX's 0.79% return.


FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.23%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
5.32%

PIAMX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.36%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%4.49%6.08%15.14%-2.30%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
0.79%2.34%11.23%16.38%-10.93%7.82%9.05%11.77%-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYSX and PIAMX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FHYSX and PIAMX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYSX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PIAMX
PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYSXPIAMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

1.35

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.75

1.84

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.27

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.12

+1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.43

3.37

+12.05

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYSX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYSXPIAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.35

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.03

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.22

-0.34

Drawdowns

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYSX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYSX and PIAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSXPIAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-18.15%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-3.75%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-6.17%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-13.92%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-2.34%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

1.25%

-0.78%

Volatility

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FHYSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYSXPIAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.73%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

2.44%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

3.12%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

4.04%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

4.23%

+1.54%

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHYSX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

FHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.29%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
7.90%9.12%8.49%8.12%7.99%8.64%6.63%6.96%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHYSX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHYSX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to PIAMX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYSX dropped -21.45% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYSX and PIAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer