PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHWDX vs. FHAWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class K (FHWDX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund (FHAWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHWDX achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly higher than FHAWX's 6.21% return.


FHWDX

1D
0.66%
1M
5.32%
YTD
13.76%
6M
15.24%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*

FHAWX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.33%
YTD
6.21%
6M
6.62%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHWDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class K
13.76%22.66%16.60%20.56%-19.02%16.41%17.99%26.50%-11.41%
FHAWX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund
6.21%12.69%6.03%11.25%-15.14%6.92%11.77%16.59%-7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FHWDX and FHAWX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FHWDX and FHAWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHWDX vs. FHAWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHWDX
FHWDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FHWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FHAWX
FHAWX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FHAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class K (FHWDX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund (FHAWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHWDXFHAWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.53

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

3.69

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.17

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.49

13.87

+0.62

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHWDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FHAWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHWDX and FHAWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHWDXFHAWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.55

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.70

+0.03

Drawdowns

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHWDX drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than FHAWX's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHWDX and FHAWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHWDXFHAWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-20.77%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-4.70%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-6.88%

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.72%

-20.77%

-6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.50%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

1.07%

+1.09%

Volatility

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class K (FHWDX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund (FHAWX) at 2.22%. This indicates that FHWDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHAWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHWDXFHAWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

2.22%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

4.88%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

5.89%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

7.66%

+7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

8.23%

+8.65%

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHWDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FHAWX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHWDX vs. FHAWX - Dividend Comparison

FHWDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than FHAWX's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAWX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund
2.66%2.92%2.58%2.61%5.62%6.93%3.87%2.79%0.00%
FHWDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class K
3.30%2.50%4.98%1.87%6.26%8.54%4.80%3.40%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHWDX and FHAWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHWDX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FHAWX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHWDX dropped -31.30% vs FHAWX's -20.77%.

FHAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHWDX and FHAWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer