FHVCX vs. PADLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FHVCX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C) and PADLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHVCX returned 6.36%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for PADLX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHVCX charges 1.48%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for PADLX.

Performance

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHVCX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.88% return.

FHVCX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 21.79%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: —

PADLX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 4.88%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.98%
• 3Y*: 10.43%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHVCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C	9.12%	17.25%	9.51%	16.43%	-19.06%	12.99%	14.61%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.88%	10.83%	8.34%	11.01%	-12.54%	2.93%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FHVCX and PADLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.87

The correlation between FHVCX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHVCX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHVCX

FHVCX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FHVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FHVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FHVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FHVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FHVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

PADLX

PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 89
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHVCX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.14	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	4.67	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.63	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	3.92	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.78	17.17	-4.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHVCX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHVCX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	3.14	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.62	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.65	-0.06

Drawdowns

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHVCX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHVCX and PADLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHVCX	PADLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.15%	-18.87%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-3.63%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.74%	-6.63%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.06%	-18.87%	-8.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-4.83%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.83%	+0.90%

Volatility

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that FHVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHVCX	PADLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	1.57%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.93%	3.62%	+4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	4.54%	+5.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.49%	6.65%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.69%	7.51%	+7.18%

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHVCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHVCX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FHVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than PADLX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHVCX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C	3.03%	2.32%	1.57%	1.35%	5.19%	7.20%	4.35%	2.78%	2.63%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.94%	5.03%	3.71%	2.91%	1.01%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHVCX and PADLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FHVCX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHVCX or PADLX?

FHVCX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHVCX dropped -29.15% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.