PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHVCX vs. FNSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHVCX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than FNSDX's 13.86% return.


FHVCX

1D
0.21%
1M
2.98%
YTD
9.12%
6M
10.38%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*

FNSDX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHVCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C
9.12%17.25%9.51%16.43%-19.06%12.99%15.60%24.23%-11.51%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
13.86%23.81%14.18%20.65%-18.23%16.65%18.34%25.58%-12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FHVCX and FNSDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FHVCX and FNSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHVCX vs. FNSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHVCX
FHVCX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FHVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FHVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSDX
FNSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHVCXFNSDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.50

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.44

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.27

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.78

14.55

-1.77

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FNSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHVCX and FNSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHVCXFNSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.50

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.70

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.74

-0.15

Drawdowns

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHVCX drawdown since its inception was -29.15%, smaller than the maximum FNSDX drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHVCX and FNSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHVCXFNSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.15%

-30.95%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-9.76%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.74%

-15.44%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-27.31%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-5.61%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.19%

-0.46%

Volatility

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C (FHVCX) is 3.38%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K (FNSDX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that FHVCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHVCXFNSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.26%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

10.54%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

12.78%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.03%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

15.98%

-1.29%

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHVCX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHVCX vs. FNSDX - Dividend Comparison

FHVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than FNSDX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHVCX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class C
3.03%2.32%1.57%1.35%5.19%7.20%4.35%2.78%2.63%0.00%
FNSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K
4.97%3.87%2.13%2.07%11.45%11.27%4.26%6.31%6.79%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FHVCX and FNSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSDX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FHVCX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHVCX dropped -29.15% vs FNSDX's -30.95%.

FNSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHVCX and FNSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer