PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHTFX vs. THMBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) and Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHTFX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than THMBX's 2.76% return.


FHTFX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.85%
YTD
2.41%
6M
2.79%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.41%

THMBX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.05%
YTD
2.76%
6M
3.28%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
2.41%2.09%5.67%6.91%-13.36%5.47%2.91%9.76%1.51%
THMBX
Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.76%2.83%5.85%7.01%-15.19%6.59%3.18%10.15%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FHTFX and THMBX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018

0.79

The correlation between FHTFX and THMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHTFX vs. THMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHTFX
FHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

THMBX
THMBX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
THMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
THMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) and Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHTFXTHMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.63

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.17

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

11.19

+3.47

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the THMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHTFX and THMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHTFX drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than THMBX's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHTFX and THMBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHTFXTHMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.61%

-21.08%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-2.71%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.60%

-7.31%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-21.08%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-5.36%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

0.77%

+0.84%

Volatility

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) is 0.64%, while Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund (THMBX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that FHTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHTFXTHMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.84%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

2.44%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.41%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

5.20%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

5.75%

-0.90%

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHTFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than THMBX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHTFX vs. THMBX - Dividend Comparison

FHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than THMBX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
3.39%3.02%4.53%3.81%3.65%3.14%3.52%3.88%3.85%3.88%4.11%4.02%
THMBX
Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund
4.29%4.31%4.10%2.81%3.11%2.77%2.92%2.93%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHTFX and THMBX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THMBX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to FHTFX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHTFX dropped -27.61% vs THMBX's -21.08%.

FHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHTFX and THMBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer