FHTFX vs. FDUAX
FHTFX (Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd) and FDUAX (First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past year, FHTFX returned 7.54% vs 2.49% for FDUAX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHTFX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for FDUAX.
Performance
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHTFX achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly higher than FDUAX's 1.83% return.
FHTFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 7.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
FDUAX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FHTFX Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd | 1.93% | 2.09% | 5.98% |
FDUAX First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A | 1.83% | 1.20% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHTFX and FDUAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FHTFX and FDUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHTFX vs. FDUAX — Risk / Return Rank
FHTFX
FDUAX
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) and First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A (FDUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHTFX | FDUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.20 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 0.73 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | 2.26 | +12.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHTFX | FDUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 0.78 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHTFX drawdown since its inception was -27.61%, which is greater than FDUAX's maximum drawdown of -3.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHTFX and FDUAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHTFX | FDUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.61% | -3.96% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -3.43% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -0.72% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 1.10% | +1.13% |
Volatility
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A (FDUAX) at 0.81%. This indicates that FHTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHTFX | FDUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.81% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 1.80% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 3.19% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 3.27% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 3.27% | +1.59% |
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHTFX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FDUAX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHTFX vs. FDUAX - Dividend Comparison
FHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than FDUAX's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDUAX First Eagle Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund Class A | 5.18% | 4.83% | 3.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHTFX Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd | 3.05% | 3.02% | 4.53% | 3.81% | 3.65% | 3.14% | 3.52% | 3.88% | 3.85% | 3.88% | 4.11% | 4.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHTFX and FDUAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHTFX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to FDUAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHTFX dropped -27.61% vs FDUAX's -3.96%.
FHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHTFX and FDUAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer