PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHTEX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHTEX having a 13.67% return and FQLSX slightly higher at 14.07%.


FHTEX

1D
0.67%
1M
5.36%
YTD
13.67%
6M
15.06%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*

FQLSX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.07%
6M
15.67%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHTEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M
13.67%22.02%15.45%19.87%-19.46%15.73%17.10%25.83%-11.99%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
14.07%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FHTEX and FQLSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FHTEX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHTEX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHTEX
FHTEX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FHTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHTEXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.36

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

14.85

-0.85

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHTEX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHTEXFQLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.54

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.78

-0.09

Drawdowns

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHTEX drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHTEX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHTEXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.37%

-31.26%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-9.48%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-15.37%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.16%

-27.41%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-5.43%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.14%

+0.05%

Volatility

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M (FHTEX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHTEXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.13%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

10.29%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

12.54%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

15.12%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

16.08%

+0.83%

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHTEX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHTEX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FHTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHTEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class M
2.99%2.10%4.34%1.62%5.81%7.93%4.28%2.65%3.51%0.00%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.59%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FHTEX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHTEX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to FQLSX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHTEX dropped -31.37% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHTEX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer