PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FHQ.TO (First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF) and TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FHQ.TO is passively managed, while TLF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FHQ.TO returned 19.80%/yr vs 21.83%/yr for TLF.TO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF (FHQ.TO) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHQ.TO achieves a 24.19% return, which is significantly lower than TLF.TO's 27.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FHQ.TO has underperformed TLF.TO with an annualized return of 19.80%, while TLF.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.83% annualized return.

FHQ.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
-4.66%
6M
18.60%
YTD
24.19%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
19.80%

TLF.TO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.87%
6M
25.65%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
38.85%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
21.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHQ.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF		24.19%8.42%25.83%36.49%-28.18%21.01%47.20%35.74%-0.09%23.66%
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		27.21%18.20%21.45%49.36%-30.09%31.51%38.89%37.12%3.76%37.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FHQ.TO and TLF.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.48

The correlation between FHQ.TO and TLF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF

Return for Risk

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FHQ.TO
FHQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FHQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FHQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
TLF.TO
TLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF (FHQ.TO) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FHQ.TOTLF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
1.60

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.92
2.04

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.65

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

9.20

-2.47

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHQ.TO and TLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.05%, smaller than the maximum TLF.TO drawdown of -37.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHQ.TO and TLF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FHQ.TOTLF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.05%

-37.19%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-14.73%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.64%

-24.99%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.05%

-37.19%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.05%

-37.19%

+5.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.70%

-6.84%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-7.35%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

4.24%

+0.87%

Volatility

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF (FHQ.TO) is 10.35%, while Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a volatility of 13.38%. This indicates that FHQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FHQ.TOTLF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

13.38%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.95%

21.66%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.24%

24.42%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

25.80%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

24.20%

-0.83%

Dividends

FHQ.TO vs. TLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FHQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHQ.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF		0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%1.18%0.43%0.50%0.80%0.83%1.20%0.43%
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		5.41%5.90%5.86%5.31%6.97%3.40%3.49%4.64%6.05%5.94%7.67%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

FHQ.TO and TLF.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Brompton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHQ.TO and TLF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer