FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO
FHQ.TO (First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FHQ.TO tracks the StrataQuant Technology Index while QMVP.TO tracks the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FHQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- YTD
- 24.19%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 19.80%
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FHQ.TO First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF | 21.92% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 26.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHQ.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FHQ.TO
QMVP.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF (FHQ.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHQ.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.05%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHQ.TO and QMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHQ.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -12.77% | -19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -2.60% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -3.62% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | — | — |
Volatility
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHQ.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 25.17% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 25.17% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 25.17% | -1.80% |
Dividends
FHQ.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
FHQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMVP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHQ.TO First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Technology Sector Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.18% | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 1.20% | 0.43% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHQ.TO and QMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHQ.TO tracks StrataQuant Technology Index, while QMVP.TO tracks Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Hamilton.
Find the right allocation for FHQ.TO and QMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer