FHMIX vs. DFABX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) and DFABX (DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FHMIX returned 1.97%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for DFABX. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FHMIX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DFABX.

Performance

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHMIX having a 1.33% return and DFABX slightly lower at 1.31%.

FHMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.03%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 1Y: 2.49%
• 3Y*: 1.97%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.14%

DFABX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.86%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.20%
• 3Y*: 2.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	1.33%	3.09%	1.19%	0.32%	0.00%
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio	1.31%	2.46%	2.90%	2.87%	0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FHMIX and DFABX is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022	0.04

Return for Risk

FHMIX vs. DFABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHMIX

FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

DFABX

DFABX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFABX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
DFABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
DFABX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHMIX	DFABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	3.90	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	12.36	8.63	+3.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.17	4.20	+2.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.05	20.63	+4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	82.74	81.43	+1.31

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the DFABX Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHMIX and DFABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHMIX drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum DFABX drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMIX and DFABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHMIX	DFABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-2.46%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-0.11%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.50%	-0.60%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.23%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.03%	0.00%

Volatility

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) is 0.00%, while DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) has a volatility of 0.23%. This indicates that FHMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHMIX	DFABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.23%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.51%	0.42%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81%	0.57%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.80%	0.95%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.78%	0.95%	-0.17%

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHMIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHMIX vs. DFABX - Dividend Comparison

FHMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, which matches DFABX's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.58%	2.33%	2.86%	2.52%	1.25%	0.00%
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	2.56%	3.04%	1.18%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHMIX and DFABX in my portfolio?

FHMIX and DFABX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHMIX or DFABX?

DFABX has higher volatility (0.23%) compared to FHMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMIX dropped -0.50% vs DFABX's -2.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.