FHMFX vs. VICBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX).
FHMFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. VICBX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009.
Performance
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund | -0.72% | 8.18% | 3.13% | 9.11% | -17.03% | -1.41% | 10.15% | 14.45% | -0.24% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | -0.51% | 9.37% | 3.67% | 8.87% | -14.06% | -1.50% | 9.57% | 15.96% | 0.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHMFX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than VICBX's -0.51% return.
FHMFX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- —
VICBX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHMFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FHMFX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank
FHMFX
VICBX
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHMFX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.95 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.01 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 7.38 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHMFX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.38 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.87 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHMFX and VICBX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison
FHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than VICBX's 4.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund | 4.39% | 4.70% | 4.52% | 4.07% | 2.65% | 2.42% | 3.05% | 3.90% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 4.32% | 4.61% | 4.79% | 3.72% | 3.02% | 2.82% | 2.79% | 5.01% | 3.64% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHMFX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMFX and VICBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHMFX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -20.55% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -3.07% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.95% | -20.55% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -2.02% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -3.16% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.84% | +0.17% |
Volatility
FHMFX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) have volatilities of 1.83% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHMFX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.82% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 2.66% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83% | 4.39% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.69% | 6.14% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 5.33% | +1.21% |