FHMFX vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FHMFX (Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both funds - FHMFX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past year, FHMFX returned 5.71% vs 6.69% for SCYB. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHMFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHMFX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.92% return.

FHMFX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 5.71%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 0.43%
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: 6.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	0.75%	8.18%	3.13%	6.60%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.92%	8.33%	8.15%	7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FHMFX and SCYB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023	0.60

The correlation between FHMFX and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHMFX vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHMFX

FHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
FHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHMFX	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.77	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.66	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.75	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.68	12.23	-6.55

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHMFX and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHMFX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMFX and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHMFX	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-4.92%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-2.44%	-0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.15%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-0.51%	-5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.01%	0.55%	+0.46%

Volatility

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.00%. This indicates that FHMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHMFX	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	1.00%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.25%	3.02%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	3.79%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.70%	5.12%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.50%	5.12%	+1.38%

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHMFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHMFX vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

FHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than SCYB's 6.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	4.83%	4.70%	4.52%	4.07%	2.65%	2.42%	3.05%	3.90%	1.49%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.91%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHMFX and SCYB in my portfolio?

FHMFX and SCYB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHMFX or SCYB?

FHMFX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to SCYB (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMFX dropped -22.95% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.