FHMFX vs. PRPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHMFX (Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund) and PRPIX (T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FHMFX returned 0.79%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PRPIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHMFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PRPIX.

Performance

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHMFX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than PRPIX's 0.40% return.

FHMFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 6.02%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: —

PRPIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 7.91%
• 3Y*: 6.62%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	0.85%	8.18%	3.13%	9.11%	-17.03%	-1.41%	10.15%	14.45%	-0.24%
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund	0.40%	9.66%	4.02%	9.47%	-17.71%	-0.76%	7.87%	15.77%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FHMFX and PRPIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.94

The correlation between FHMFX and PRPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHMFX vs. PRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHMFX

FHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PRPIX

PRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
PRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) and T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHMFX	PRPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.94	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.94	-0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.46	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	8.53	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHMFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHMFX and PRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHMFX	PRPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	1.94	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.15	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.87	-0.40

Drawdowns

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHMFX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum PRPIX drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMFX and PRPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHMFX	PRPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.95%	-24.24%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-3.29%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.45%	-6.30%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.95%	-24.24%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.79%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-3.14%	-3.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	0.95%	+0.03%

Volatility

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund (FHMFX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) at 1.45%. This indicates that FHMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHMFX	PRPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	1.45%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.23%	3.08%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40%	4.17%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	6.59%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.51%	6.02%	+0.49%

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHMFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPIX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHMFX vs. PRPIX - Dividend Comparison

FHMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than PRPIX's 6.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHMFX Fidelity Series Corporate Bond Fund	4.83%	4.70%	4.52%	4.07%	2.65%	2.42%	3.05%	3.90%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund	6.28%	6.30%	5.97%	4.72%	2.42%	5.61%	3.82%	5.47%	3.47%	3.95%	3.20%	4.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHMFX and PRPIX in my portfolio?

FHMFX and PRPIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHMFX or PRPIX?

FHMFX has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to PRPIX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMFX dropped -22.95% vs PRPIX's -24.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.