PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLFX vs. FSGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's 13.01% return.


FHLFX

1D
-2.03%
1M
0.00%
YTD
8.47%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

FSGEX

1D
-2.87%
1M
0.68%
YTD
13.01%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
8.47%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
13.01%32.99%5.34%15.56%-15.75%7.77%10.75%21.41%-10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLFX and FSGEX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.97

The correlation between FHLFX and FSGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLFX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGEX
FSGEX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FSGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHLFXFSGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.70

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

10.37

-3.07

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FSGEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLFX and FSGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGEX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and FSGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLFXFSGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-34.74%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-11.24%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-13.34%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

-29.44%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-2.87%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-8.42%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.92%

+0.12%

Volatility

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) is 5.20%, while Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that FHLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLFXFSGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

7.08%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

13.85%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

15.82%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

15.65%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

16.12%

+1.54%

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FHLFX and FSGEX have an expense ratio of 0.01%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHLFX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison

FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than FSGEX's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.19%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.67%3.02%2.98%2.90%2.78%2.59%1.68%2.10%2.86%2.48%2.56%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FHLFX and FSGEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSGEX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to FHLFX (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLFX dropped -33.58% vs FSGEX's -34.74%.

FSGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLFX and FSGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer