FHLDX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHLDX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHLDX returned 5.90%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for FQLSX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHLDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQLSX.

Performance

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHLDX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLDX achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 14.07% return.

FHLDX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 8.92%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 13.18%
• 5Y*: 5.90%
• 10Y*: —

FQLSX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHLDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6	8.25%	16.12%	8.06%	14.26%	-16.93%	9.94%	14.49%	20.17%	-7.30%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	14.07%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	16.89%	18.43%	25.96%	-11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLDX and FQLSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018	0.97

The correlation between FHLDX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHLDX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLDX

FHLDX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FHLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FHLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FHLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FHLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FHLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHLDX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLDX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.54	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	3.50	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.47	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.36	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.78	14.85	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLDX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLDX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.54	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.75	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.78	-0.05

Drawdowns

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLDX drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLDX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLDX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.79%	-31.26%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-9.48%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.96%	-15.37%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.79%	-27.41%	+3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-5.43%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	2.14%	-0.70%

Volatility

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHLDX) is 2.88%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that FHLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLDX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	4.13%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	10.29%	-3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.98%	12.54%	-4.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.01%	15.12%	-5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.92%	16.08%	-5.16%

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHLDX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FHLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class K6	3.39%	2.60%	2.43%	2.47%	5.87%	6.79%	4.40%	3.16%	2.23%	0.00%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.59%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHLDX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FHLDX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHLDX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FHLDX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLDX dropped -23.79% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.