FHKTX vs. WCQGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX).

FHKTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. WCQGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 30, 2020.

Performance

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	8.22%	41.85%	22.53%	-0.84%	-24.32%	-14.20%	64.94%
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	-3.58%	20.97%	-3.03%	-18.49%	-26.70%	4.03%	64.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKTX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than WCQGX's -3.58% return.

FHKTX

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 45.66%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

WCQGX

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -4.75%
• YTD: -3.58%
• 6M: -12.57%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: -3.22%
• 5Y*: -8.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FHKTX and WCQGX have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

FHKTX

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M

WCQGX

WCM China Quality Growth Fund

Return for Risk

FHKTX vs. WCQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKTX

FHKTX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FHKTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FHKTX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FHKTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FHKTX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

WCQGX

WCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 7
WCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHKTX	WCQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	0.23	+1.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	0.46	+2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.06	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	0.26	+2.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	0.65	+10.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the WCQGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKTX and WCQGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHKTX	WCQGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	0.23	+1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	-0.36	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.10	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FHKTX and WCQGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Dividend Comparison

FHKTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than WCQGX's 6.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M	1.17%	1.27%	1.10%	1.27%	0.29%	10.88%	4.51%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	14.81%
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	6.91%	6.67%	2.02%	0.82%	0.28%	8.54%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKTX drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, roughly equal to the maximum WCQGX drawdown of -59.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKTX and WCQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKTX	WCQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.83%	-59.28%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-15.08%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.25%	-57.82%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.42%	-44.45%	+36.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-34.13%	+14.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	6.65%	-2.48%

Volatility

FHKTX vs. WCQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) at 7.14%. This indicates that FHKTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKTX	WCQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.78%	7.14%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.53%	15.84%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.26%	22.78%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.99%	23.45%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.11%	23.76%	-1.65%