FHKTX vs. TDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF).
FHKTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. TDF is managed by Franklin Templeton Investments.
Performance
FHKTX vs. TDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKTX vs. TDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 8.22% | 41.85% | 22.53% | -0.84% | -24.32% | -14.20% | 46.95% | 34.26% | -17.96% | 50.94% |
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | -5.24% | 37.70% | 5.44% | -20.06% | -32.93% | -18.02% | 52.98% | 27.97% | -11.80% | 42.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKTX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than TDF's -5.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKTX has outperformed TDF with an annualized return of 11.79%, while TDF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.55% annualized return.
FHKTX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 45.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
TDF
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -9.15%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -9.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKTX vs. TDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
FHKTX vs. TDF — Risk / Return Rank
FHKTX
TDF
FHKTX vs. TDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) and Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKTX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 0.56 | +1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 0.87 | +1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 0.81 | +2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.05 | 2.69 | +8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKTX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 0.56 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.36 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.19 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKTX and TDF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHKTX vs. TDF - Dividend Comparison
FHKTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than TDF's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKTX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M | 1.17% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.27% | 0.29% | 10.88% | 4.51% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 14.81% |
TDF Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. | 3.78% | 3.55% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 12.73% | 14.13% | 24.72% | 10.75% | 12.43% | 7.95% | 10.34% | 22.49% |
Drawdowns
FHKTX vs. TDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKTX drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, smaller than the maximum TDF drawdown of -68.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKTX and TDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKTX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.83% | -68.15% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -15.10% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.25% | -62.07% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.83% | -66.87% | +8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -48.55% | +40.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -22.44% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.86% | -0.69% |
Volatility
FHKTX vs. TDF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class M (FHKTX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to Templeton Dragon Fund Inc. (TDF) at 5.72%. This indicates that FHKTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKTX | TDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 5.72% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 12.47% | +4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.26% | 21.71% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 27.18% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 23.88% | -1.77% |