FHKIX vs. FERIX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FHKIX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I) and FERIX (Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - FHKIX is a China Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FERIX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FHKIX returned 14.27%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for FERIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHKIX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for FERIX.

Performance

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHKIX having a 33.09% return and FERIX slightly higher at 34.07%. Over the past 10 years, FHKIX has underperformed FERIX with an annualized return of 14.27%, while FERIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.37% annualized return.

FHKIX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 23.00%
• YTD: 33.09%
• 1Y: 65.09%
• 3Y*: 31.71%
• 5Y*: 8.77%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

FERIX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 25.86%
• YTD: 34.07%
• 1Y: 57.15%
• 3Y*: 32.57%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 15.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I	33.09%	42.60%	23.15%	-0.28%	-23.85%	-13.71%	47.80%	35.11%	-17.43%	51.93%
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I	34.07%	37.04%	20.95%	13.84%	-30.60%	-14.83%	72.97%	31.02%	-14.87%	45.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKIX and FERIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FHKIX and FERIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHKIX vs. FERIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKIX

FHKIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FHKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FHKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FHKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FHKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FHKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FERIX

FERIX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FERIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FERIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FERIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FERIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FERIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKIX	FERIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.40	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	2.88	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.06	4.25	+1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.37	14.01	+3.36

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the FERIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKIX and FERIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKIX drawdown since its inception was -58.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FERIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKIX and FERIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKIX	FERIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.42%	-60.82%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.80%	-13.53%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.02%	-17.21%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.70%	-51.46%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.42%	-57.71%	-0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.87%	-5.33%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-18.09%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	4.09%	-0.33%

Volatility

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) is 10.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that FHKIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKIX	FERIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	11.36%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.79%	21.53%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.78%	23.90%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.66%	23.63%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.55%	21.34%	+1.21%

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FERIX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKIX vs. FERIX - Dividend Comparison

FHKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while FERIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERIX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	12.49%	6.58%	5.30%	6.70%	0.03%	1.29%	0.82%
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I	1.38%	1.84%	1.44%	1.89%	1.04%	10.81%	4.90%	0.65%	0.79%	0.44%	1.40%	15.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKIX and FERIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FHKIX and FERIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHKIX or FERIX?

FERIX has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to FHKIX (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKIX dropped -58.42% vs FERIX's -60.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.