PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKDX vs. PRMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKDX achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly higher than PRMYX's 2.30% return.


FHKDX

1D
1.49%
1M
-1.02%
6M
4.99%
YTD
7.53%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.59%

PRMYX

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.23%
6M
2.28%
YTD
2.30%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
3.20%
ALL TIME*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHKDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
7.53%17.16%11.51%15.59%-17.34%11.29%15.45%22.82%-9.37%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
2.30%8.38%6.31%9.82%-4.22%0.02%1.29%8.54%-5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKDX and PRMYX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.79

The correlation between FHKDX and PRMYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKDX vs. PRMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHKDX
FHKDX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FHKDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMYX
PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) and Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHKDXPRMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.76

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

7.09

+2.08

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the PRMYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKDX and PRMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKDX drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, which is greater than PRMYX's maximum drawdown of -9.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKDX and PRMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKDXPRMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-9.74%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.85%

-3.50%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.12%

-7.35%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-9.24%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-0.63%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-1.68%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.87%

+0.80%

Volatility

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6 (FHKDX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) at 1.44%. This indicates that FHKDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKDXPRMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.44%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

3.88%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

4.83%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

5.26%

+5.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.31%

4.50%

+7.81%

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKDX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PRMYX's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHKDX vs. PRMYX - Dividend Comparison

FHKDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than PRMYX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class K6
3.77%3.10%4.50%2.36%5.54%7.10%4.65%3.34%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
3.41%3.30%3.15%3.62%7.46%2.47%2.17%2.97%1.73%0.55%1.53%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FHKDX and PRMYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHKDX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to PRMYX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKDX dropped -24.65% vs PRMYX's -9.74%.

FHKDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKDX and PRMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer