FHJUX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHJUX (Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FHJUX returned 7.85%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for BIAHX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHJUX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A (FHJUX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHJUX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FHJUX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.

FHJUX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 11.59%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHJUX Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A	7.15%	37.16%	3.89%	13.27%	-20.84%	6.30%	17.92%	24.05%	-17.46%	28.76%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	0.84%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FHJUX and BIAHX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2014	0.92

The correlation between FHJUX and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHJUX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHJUX

FHJUX Risk / Return Rank: 17
FHJUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FHJUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FHJUX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FHJUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FHJUX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A (FHJUX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHJUX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	0.80	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.22	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	0.84	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	2.61	+2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHJUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHJUX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHJUX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	0.80	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.75	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.68	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.58	-0.23

Drawdowns

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHJUX drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHJUX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHJUX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-34.90%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.40%	-13.18%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.37%	-13.18%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.24%	-30.95%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.24%	-34.90%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-6.93%	+6.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.11%	-6.03%	-4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	4.23%	-0.89%

Volatility

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A (FHJUX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 4.90%. This indicates that FHJUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHJUX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.32%	4.90%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.04%	11.49%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.34%	13.93%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	16.36%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	17.29%	+0.65%

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHJUX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHJUX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

FHJUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than BIAHX's 7.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.54%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%
FHJUX Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class A	1.77%	1.89%	2.96%	1.25%	0.00%	15.72%	0.89%	7.09%	11.22%	2.33%	1.04%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHJUX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

FHJUX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHJUX or BIAHX?

FHJUX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to BIAHX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHJUX dropped -38.24% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHJUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.