FHJMX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHJMX (Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FHJMX returned 9.35%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for BIAHX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHJMX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I (FHJMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FHJMX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.

FHJMX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 9.01%
• 1Y: 21.19%
• 3Y*: 18.01%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 10.15%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHJMX Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I	8.98%	37.51%	4.20%	13.70%	-20.60%	6.63%	18.31%	24.49%	-17.19%	29.18%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	0.00%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FHJMX and BIAHX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2014	0.92

The correlation between FHJMX and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHJMX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHJMX

FHJMX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FHJMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FHJMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FHJMX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FHJMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FHJMX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I (FHJMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHJMX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.78	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.21	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.15	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	0.83	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.69	2.42	+4.27

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHJMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHJMX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHJMX drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHJMX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHJMX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.02%	-34.90%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.37%	-13.18%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.27%	-13.18%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.02%	-30.95%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.02%	-34.90%	-3.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.70%	+7.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-6.03%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	4.53%	-1.20%

Volatility

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I (FHJMX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 3.94%. This indicates that FHJMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHJMX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	3.94%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	11.83%	+2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	14.04%	+2.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	16.40%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.90%	17.22%	+0.68%

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHJMX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHJMX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

FHJMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than BIAHX's 7.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.60%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%
FHJMX Fidelity Advisor Europe Fund Class I	2.14%	2.33%	3.09%	1.64%	0.00%	16.02%	1.20%	7.46%	11.95%	2.58%	1.59%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHJMX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

FHJMX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHJMX or BIAHX?

FHJMX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to BIAHX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHJMX dropped -38.02% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHJMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.