PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHJKX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class A (FHJKX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHJKX achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 9.87% return.


FHJKX

1D
2.26%
1M
-1.09%
6M
7.78%
YTD
11.63%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.24%

FSKAX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.80%
6M
8.19%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
14.44%
ALL TIME*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHJKX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class A
11.63%22.28%15.86%20.27%-19.30%15.94%17.55%26.08%-11.95%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
9.87%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-14.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FHJKX and FSKAX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FHJKX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHJKX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHJKX
FHJKX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHJKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHJKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHJKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FHJKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHJKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class A (FHJKX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHJKXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.09

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

8.96

+0.63

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHJKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHJKX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHJKX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHJKX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHJKXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-35.01%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-8.92%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-19.43%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-25.39%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-1.97%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-3.99%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.08%

+0.21%

Volatility

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class A (FHJKX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FHJKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHJKXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.43%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

10.33%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

13.21%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.31%

17.52%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.45%

-1.57%

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHJKX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHJKX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FHJKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHJKX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class A
3.21%2.32%4.52%1.72%6.12%8.28%4.60%3.06%3.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.95%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHJKX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHJKX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to FSKAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHJKX dropped -31.40% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FHJKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHJKX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer