FHJDX vs. PADLX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6 (FHJDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX).

FHJDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 31, 2018. PADLX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Dec 30, 2019.

Performance

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6 (FHJDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHJDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6	-0.37%	18.66%	13.60%	17.84%	-18.17%	14.30%	15.96%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	-0.28%	10.83%	8.34%	11.01%	-12.54%	2.93%	7.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHJDX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PADLX's -0.28% return.

FHJDX

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: -4.62%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: —

PADLX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: -0.28%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 9.84%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 3.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHJDX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.

FHJDX

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6

PADLX

Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund

Return for Risk

FHJDX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHJDX

FHJDX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FHJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FHJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FHJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FHJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FHJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

PADLX

PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6 (FHJDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHJDX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.75	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.46	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.37	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.23	-0.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	9.78	-1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHJDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHJDX and PADLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHJDX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	1.75	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.52	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.55	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between FHJDX and PADLX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FHJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than PADLX's 4.74% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHJDX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6	3.06%	3.05%	5.00%	2.19%	5.82%	7.78%	4.94%	3.54%	3.07%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.74%	5.03%	3.71%	2.91%	1.01%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHJDX drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHJDX and PADLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHJDX	PADLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.08%	-18.87%	-10.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-4.65%	-4.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.23%	-18.87%	-7.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.41%	-2.93%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-4.95%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.06%	+0.94%

Volatility

FHJDX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class K6 (FHJDX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 2.05%. This indicates that FHJDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHJDX	PADLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.05%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.35%	3.27%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.28%	5.82%	+6.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.50%	6.63%	+5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.76%	7.56%	+7.20%