PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

FHI.TO (CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF) and TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) are both exchange-traded funds - FHI.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by CI, while TXF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CI Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FHI.TO returned 5.58%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for TXF.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI.TO achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than TXF.TO's 29.94% return.

FHI.TO

1D
-0.93%
1M
4.19%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.26%
1Y
11.83%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
—

TXF.TO

1D
3.16%
1M
0.74%
YTD
29.94%
6M
28.83%
1Y
52.91%
3Y*
31.00%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHI.TO
CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF		1.35%11.94%-0.77%0.77%1.73%27.35%6.25%23.54%-3.26%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		29.94%24.80%18.69%60.80%-35.54%26.82%32.50%26.56%-17.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FHI.TO and TXF.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018

0.21

The correlation between FHI.TO and TXF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF

CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common

Often compared with TXF.TO:
TXF.TO vs. QQQY.TOTXF.TO vs. HDIV.TOTXF.TO vs. XEQT.TOTXF.TO vs. QQCL.TOTXF.TO vs. HXQ.TOTXF.TO vs. VFV.TOTXF.TO vs. HTAE.TO

Return for Risk

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FHI.TO
FHI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
TXF.TO
TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FHI.TOTXF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.89
2.31

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.42
2.85

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.39

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.45

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

12.13

-9.07

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI.TO and TXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.85%, smaller than the maximum TXF.TO drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI.TO and TXF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FHI.TOTXF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-41.23%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-15.43%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.43%

-27.38%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.43%

-41.23%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-41.23%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.37%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-6.17%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

4.37%

-0.50%

Volatility

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) is 4.59%, while CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that FHI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FHI.TOTXF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

12.23%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

19.77%

-10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

23.01%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

25.16%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

23.77%

-7.25%

Dividends

FHI.TO vs. TXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, less than TXF.TO's 8.74% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHI.TO
CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF		7.02%7.14%7.84%5.80%5.98%7.38%9.69%5.42%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		8.74%10.59%9.75%7.48%14.13%7.77%11.01%7.29%9.29%4.89%6.16%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

FHI.TO and TXF.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHI.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while TXF.TO is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI and CI Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHI.TO and TXF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer