FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FHI.TO (CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FHI.TO returned 5.82%/yr vs 27.29%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHI.TO achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 29.68% return.

FHI.TO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 6.38%
• 6M: 2.60%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 1Y: 17.45%
• 3Y*: 6.36%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: —

ENCC.TO

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 5.14%
• 6M: 27.15%
• YTD: 29.68%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 22.36%
• 5Y*: 27.29%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHI.TO CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF	4.47%	11.94%	-0.77%	0.77%	1.73%	27.35%	6.25%	23.54%	-3.26%
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	29.68%	13.13%	17.39%	5.72%	41.32%	80.54%	-27.98%	6.56%	-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FHI.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2018	0.15

The correlation between FHI.TO and ENCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FHI.TO	ENCC.TO
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHI.TO

FHI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 48
FHI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FHI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FHI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FHI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FHI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ENCC.TO

ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHI.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.70	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	3.51	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.47	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	4.82	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	13.85	-9.29

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHI.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.85%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHI.TO and ENCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHI.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.85%	-93.29%	+63.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-8.48%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.43%	-16.67%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.43%	-25.58%	+11.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-82.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-25.35%	+25.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-55.86%	+51.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	2.94%	+0.90%

Volatility

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF (FHI.TO) is 4.84%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that FHI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHI.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	5.27%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.93%	12.46%	-2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	15.12%	-1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	22.70%	-8.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	29.01%	-12.48%

Dividends

FHI.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	11.15%	13.62%	14.58%	14.87%	12.55%	4.23%	5.10%	6.11%	8.37%	6.93%	4.34%	3.03%
FHI.TO CI Health Care Giants Covered Call ETF	6.81%	7.14%	7.84%	5.80%	5.98%	7.38%	9.69%	5.42%	2.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHI.TO and ENCC.TO in my portfolio?

FHI.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between FHI.TO and ENCC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: CI and Global X.