FHGDX vs. PADLX
FHGDX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class I) and PADLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHGDX returned 8.09%/yr vs 4.13%/yr for PADLX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHGDX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for PADLX.
Performance
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHGDX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.88% return.
FHGDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 23.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PADLX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHGDX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class I | 10.11% | 18.38% | 13.26% | 17.63% | -18.37% | 14.09% | 15.79% |
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund | 4.88% | 10.83% | 8.34% | 11.01% | -12.54% | 2.93% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHGDX and PADLX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FHGDX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHGDX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank
FHGDX
PADLX
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class I (FHGDX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHGDX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.63 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.92 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 17.17 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHGDX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 3.14 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.65 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHGDX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGDX and PADLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHGDX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -18.87% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.41% | -3.63% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | -6.63% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.39% | -18.87% | -7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -4.83% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 0.83% | +0.88% |
Volatility
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class I (FHGDX) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that FHGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHGDX | PADLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 1.57% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 3.62% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.60% | 4.54% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 6.65% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 7.51% | +7.19% |
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHGDX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHGDX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison
FHGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than PADLX's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHGDX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class I | 3.49% | 2.87% | 4.64% | 2.01% | 5.74% | 7.84% | 4.84% | 3.57% | 2.99% |
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund | 4.94% | 5.03% | 3.71% | 2.91% | 1.01% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FHGDX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FHGDX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGDX dropped -29.13% vs PADLX's -18.87%.
PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHGDX and PADLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer