PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Industrials Sector Index ETF (FHG.TO) and First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHG.TO achieves a 13.37% return, which is significantly higher than ETP.TO's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FHG.TO has outperformed ETP.TO with an annualized return of 13.82%, while ETP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.70% annualized return.


FHG.TO

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.52%
6M
4.59%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
19.43%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
13.82%

ETP.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
6M
4.76%
YTD
5.10%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Industrials Sector Index ETF
13.37%2.40%26.33%23.13%-11.70%27.10%7.70%29.30%-11.05%15.22%
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF
5.10%9.03%11.18%5.68%-10.84%6.08%-0.95%11.41%-4.09%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FHG.TO and ETP.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHG.TO
FHG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FHG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FHG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ETP.TO
ETP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ETP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Industrials Sector Index ETF (FHG.TO) and First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHG.TOETP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.58

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

3.90

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

16.53

-11.85

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ETP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHG.TO and ETP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHG.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.86%, which is greater than ETP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHG.TO and ETP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHG.TOETP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.86%

-26.38%

-12.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.01%

-2.81%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.15%

-5.73%

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-15.30%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

-26.38%

-12.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

0.00%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-3.26%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

0.66%

+3.50%

Volatility

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Industrials Sector Index ETF (FHG.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF (ETP.TO) at 0.70%. This indicates that FHG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHG.TOETP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

0.70%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

2.90%

+12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

3.78%

+15.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

5.86%

+13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

7.13%

+12.66%

Dividends

FHG.TO vs. ETP.TO - Dividend Comparison

FHG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ETP.TO's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETP.TO
First Trust Global Risk Managed Income Index ETF
3.62%4.03%3.73%4.15%3.25%2.93%3.78%3.76%4.33%4.08%3.84%4.28%
FHG.TO
First Trust AlphaDEX U.S. Industrials Sector Index ETF
0.57%0.40%1.09%0.77%1.33%0.34%1.11%0.57%1.36%0.54%0.24%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHG.TO and ETP.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHG.TO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ETP.TO is Global Equity Income. FHG.TO tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index, while ETP.TO tracks Nasdaq Global Risk Managed Income Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHG.TO and ETP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer