PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCDX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHCDX having a 14.02% return and FCTKX slightly lower at 13.94%.


FHCDX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.47%
YTD
14.02%
6M
15.56%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*

FCTKX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.94%
6M
15.86%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
14.02%22.85%16.96%20.69%-18.85%16.45%18.05%26.63%-11.79%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
13.94%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCDX and FCTKX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FHCDX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCDX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCDX
FHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCDXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.30

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

14.70

-0.08

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCDX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCDXFCTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.52

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.72

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.77

-0.03

Drawdowns

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCDX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FCTKX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCDX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCDXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-30.94%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-9.78%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-15.40%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-27.16%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-5.46%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.18%

-0.01%

Volatility

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCDXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.27%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

10.54%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

12.80%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

15.05%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

15.89%

+1.01%

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCDX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

FHCDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FCTKX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.14%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
3.31%2.52%5.51%2.05%5.98%8.10%4.24%3.04%3.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FHCDX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to FHCDX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCDX dropped -31.28% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCDX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer