FHBFX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHBFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHBFX returned 10.14%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for FQLSX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHBFX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQLSX.

Performance

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z (FHBFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHBFX having a 13.58% return and FQLSX slightly higher at 14.07%.

FHBFX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 6M: 15.03%
• 1Y: 30.57%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: —

FQLSX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHBFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z	13.58%	22.75%	13.59%	20.60%	-18.99%	16.39%	17.96%	26.61%	-11.87%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	14.07%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	16.89%	18.43%	25.96%	-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FHBFX and FQLSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.99

The correlation between FHBFX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHBFX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHBFX

FHBFX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FHBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FHBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FHBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FHBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FHBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z (FHBFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHBFX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.54	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.50	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.47	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	3.36	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	14.85	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHBFX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHBFX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.54	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.75	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.78	-0.07

Drawdowns

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHBFX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHBFX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHBFX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.28%	-31.26%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-9.48%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.48%	-15.37%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.71%	-27.41%	-0.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.89%	-5.43%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.14%	0.00%

Volatility

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z (FHBFX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHBFX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	4.13%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	10.29%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	12.54%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.04%	15.12%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	16.08%	+0.75%

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHBFX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHBFX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

FHBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FQLSX's 4.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHBFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class Z	3.56%	2.68%	2.40%	1.95%	6.31%	8.72%	4.91%	3.29%	3.17%	0.00%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.59%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHBFX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FHBFX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHBFX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FHBFX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHBFX dropped -31.28% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.