FHAWX vs. DRIQX
FHAWX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund) and DRIQX (Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHAWX returned 3.69%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for DRIQX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FHAWX charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DRIQX.
Performance
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHAWX achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 3.10% return.
FHAWX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.47%
DRIQX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 6.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHAWX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund | 5.03% | 12.69% | 6.03% | 11.25% | -15.14% | 6.92% | 11.77% | 16.59% | -7.70% |
DRIQX Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 3.10% | 8.83% | 5.47% | 8.17% | -14.79% | 7.79% | 14.31% | 14.08% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHAWX and DRIQX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FHAWX and DRIQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHAWX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank
FHAWX
DRIQX
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund (FHAWX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHAWX | DRIQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.29 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.00 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 7.86 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHAWX drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, roughly equal to the maximum DRIQX drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAWX and DRIQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHAWX | DRIQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.77% | -19.86% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.70% | -3.47% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.75% | -5.12% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -19.86% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.22% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -3.84% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 0.88% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund (FHAWX) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.08%. This indicates that FHAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHAWX | DRIQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 1.08% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | 3.60% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 4.51% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 7.06% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.24% | 6.58% | +1.66% |
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHAWX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHAWX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison
FHAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than DRIQX's 6.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIQX Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund | 6.35% | 4.95% | 4.53% | 4.28% | 6.51% | 4.54% | 3.76% | 2.05% | 2.23% | 1.66% | 1.37% |
FHAWX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2015 Fund | 2.69% | 2.92% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 5.62% | 6.93% | 3.87% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FHAWX and DRIQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FHAWX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to DRIQX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAWX dropped -20.77% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.
FHAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHAWX and DRIQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer