PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHASX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHASX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHASX having a 8.51% return and URTRX slightly lower at 8.39%.


FHASX

1D
1.68%
1M
-1.02%
6M
5.63%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
7.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.23%

URTRX

1D
0.84%
1M
0.35%
6M
6.07%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
7.71%
ALL TIME*
7.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHASX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
8.51%18.32%13.29%17.57%-18.33%14.11%16.71%25.44%-13.80%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.39%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%12.23%9.25%17.13%-8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FHASX and URTRX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FHASX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHASX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHASX
FHASX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHASX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHASXURTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.90

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

12.19

-2.96

FHASX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHASX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHASX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHASX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHASX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHASXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-34.10%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-5.29%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-9.12%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-19.52%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.28%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-4.12%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.25%

+0.57%

Volatility

FHASX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) has a higher volatility of 3.27% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 2.00%. This indicates that FHASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHASXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

2.00%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

6.61%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

7.81%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

9.76%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

10.31%

+4.39%

FHASX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHASX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHASX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

FHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than URTRX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
3.59%2.95%4.66%2.04%5.70%7.94%4.87%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.25%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FHASX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHASX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to URTRX (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHASX dropped -29.13% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHASX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer