PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHASX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHASX achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than TRRJX's 9.02% return.


FHASX

1D
1.16%
1M
2.57%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.73%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*

TRRJX

1D
0.95%
1M
1.27%
YTD
9.02%
6M
8.89%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
10.68%18.32%13.29%17.57%-18.33%14.11%16.71%25.44%-13.80%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
9.02%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FHASX and TRRJX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.95

The correlation between FHASX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHASX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHASX
FHASX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHASXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.97

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.49

7.54

+5.95

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHASX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHASX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHASX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHASXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-53.57%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-8.06%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-12.52%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-25.85%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

-6.63%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.09%

-0.35%

Volatility

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) at 3.96%. This indicates that FHASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHASXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

3.96%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

9.38%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

10.96%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

12.92%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.74%

13.57%

+1.17%

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHASX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHASX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

FHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHASX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund
3.52%2.95%4.66%2.04%5.70%7.94%4.87%3.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHASX and TRRJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHASX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to TRRJX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHASX dropped -29.13% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

FHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHASX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer