FHASX vs. FDFPX
FHASX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund) and FDFPX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHASX returned 7.52%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for FDFPX. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FHASX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FDFPX.
Performance
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHASX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.26% return.
FHASX
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
FDFPX
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHASX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund | 8.51% | 18.32% | 13.29% | 17.57% | -18.33% | 14.11% | 16.71% | 9.11% |
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 12.26% | 22.81% | 17.81% | 20.93% | -18.57% | 16.84% | 18.54% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHASX and FDFPX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FHASX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHASX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank
FHASX
FDFPX
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHASX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.40 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | 10.04 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHASX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHASX and FDFPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHASX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -31.22% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -9.54% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.66% | -15.42% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.40% | -27.41% | +1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -2.19% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -5.76% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.28% | -0.46% |
Volatility
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund (FHASX) is 3.27%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that FHASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHASX | FDFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 4.37% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 12.20% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 14.21% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 15.34% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 17.21% | -2.51% |
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHASX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHASX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison
FHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDFPX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund | 3.81% | 2.87% | 6.56% | 2.22% | 5.41% | 8.52% | 5.38% | 3.19% |
FHASX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2035 Fund | 3.59% | 2.95% | 4.66% | 2.04% | 5.70% | 7.94% | 4.87% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FHASX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FDFPX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to FHASX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHASX dropped -29.13% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.
FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHASX and FDFPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer