PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHAHX vs. PRBMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class Z (FHAHX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund (PRBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHAHX achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than PRBMX's 11.45% return.


FHAHX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.83%
6M
3.10%
YTD
4.29%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*

PRBMX

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.88%
6M
8.87%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FHAHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class Z
4.29%10.12%4.21%8.20%-11.60%2.88%8.69%0.00%
PRBMX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund
11.45%20.74%14.85%20.06%-16.80%18.66%13.41%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FHAHX and PRBMX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.73

The correlation between FHAHX and PRBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHAHX vs. PRBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHAHX
FHAHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FHAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PRBMX
PRBMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PRBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class Z (FHAHX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund (PRBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHAHXPRBMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.51

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

10.81

-0.36

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the PRBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHAHX and PRBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHAHX drawdown since its inception was -16.02%, smaller than the maximum PRBMX drawdown of -32.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHAHX and PRBMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHAHXPRBMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-32.13%

+16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.71%

-8.95%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

-15.32%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.02%

-25.27%

+9.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.18%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-5.32%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.07%

-1.19%

Volatility

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class Z (FHAHX) is 1.85%, while PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund (PRBMX) has a volatility of 3.77%. This indicates that FHAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHAHXPRBMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.85%

3.77%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

10.18%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07%

12.28%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.53%

14.65%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

17.14%

-12.08%

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHAHX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PRBMX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHAHX vs. PRBMX - Dividend Comparison

FHAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than PRBMX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHAHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend Income Fund Class Z
2.94%3.26%3.12%2.96%4.70%4.07%2.68%2.43%1.51%
PRBMX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund
3.27%3.01%3.56%1.53%1.60%10.13%0.88%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHAHX and PRBMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRBMX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to FHAHX (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHAHX dropped -16.02% vs PRBMX's -32.13%.

PRBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHAHX and PRBMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer