FGZMX vs. SHCDX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGZMX (Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I) and SHCDX (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FGZMX returned 3.77%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for SHCDX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGZMX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for SHCDX.

Performance

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I (FGZMX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGZMX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than SHCDX's 2.83% return.

FGZMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 3.72%
• 6M: 4.49%
• 1Y: 16.06%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: —

SHCDX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.72%
• 1Y: 9.55%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FGZMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I	3.72%	14.73%	6.85%	13.99%	-16.15%	-2.37%	4.53%	10.98%	0.14%
SHCDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt	2.83%	8.81%	7.58%	9.70%	-11.76%	1.95%	7.77%	13.94%	0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FGZMX and SHCDX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018	0.69

The correlation between FGZMX and SHCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGZMX vs. SHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGZMX

FGZMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
FGZMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FGZMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FGZMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FGZMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FGZMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SHCDX

SHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 96
SHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I (FGZMX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGZMX	SHCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.66	4.69	-1.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	6.09	7.77	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	2.38	-0.60
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	5.02	-0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.78	20.42	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGZMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is comparable to the SHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGZMX and SHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGZMX	SHCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66	4.69	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.83	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.09	-0.49

Drawdowns

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGZMX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, roughly equal to the maximum SHCDX drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGZMX and SHCDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGZMX	SHCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.17%	-26.24%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-1.90%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.50%	-3.86%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.17%	-21.81%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-3.12%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	0.47%	+0.40%

Volatility

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I (FGZMX) has a higher volatility of 1.53% compared to Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt (SHCDX) at 0.73%. This indicates that FGZMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGZMX	SHCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	0.73%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.57%	1.68%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.39%	2.05%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.62%	3.87%	+2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.29%	4.95%	+2.34%

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGZMX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than SHCDX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGZMX vs. SHCDX - Dividend Comparison

FGZMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than SHCDX's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGZMX Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class I	4.86%	5.04%	4.68%	5.14%	3.93%	3.46%	4.05%	4.85%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHCDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerg Mkts Corp Dbt	6.09%	6.00%	6.33%	5.72%	5.52%	4.65%	5.28%	4.72%	6.08%	4.10%	5.44%	5.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGZMX and SHCDX in my portfolio?

FGZMX and SHCDX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGZMX or SHCDX?

FGZMX has higher volatility (1.53%) compared to SHCDX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGZMX dropped -27.17% vs SHCDX's -26.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.69 vs 3.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.