PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGVMX vs. APFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGVMX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than APFOX's 6.99% return.


FGVMX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.57%
6M
0.96%
YTD
2.44%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.85%

APFOX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.61%
6M
4.70%
YTD
6.99%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FGVMX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A
2.44%14.54%6.49%13.64%-5.34%
APFOX
Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
6.99%13.45%10.61%11.44%7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FGVMX and APFOX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.50

The correlation between FGVMX and APFOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGVMX vs. APFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGVMX
FGVMX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FGVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

APFOX
APFOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
APFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) and Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGVMXAPFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

2.29

-0.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.64

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

19.49

-8.07

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is lower than the APFOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGVMX and APFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGVMX drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than APFOX's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGVMX and APFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGVMXAPFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-5.69%

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.80%

-3.21%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.90%

-5.69%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

0.00%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-0.69%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.76%

+0.16%

Volatility

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A (FGVMX) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX) at 0.59%. This indicates that FGVMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGVMXAPFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.59%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

2.50%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

2.86%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

3.69%

+2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.22%

3.69%

+3.53%

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGVMX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than APFOX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGVMX vs. APFOX - Dividend Comparison

FGVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than APFOX's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
APFOX
Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
7.51%5.71%9.39%9.03%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGVMX
Fidelity Advisor New Markets Income Fund Class A
4.32%4.80%4.42%4.86%3.68%3.20%3.76%4.56%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGVMX and APFOX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGVMX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to APFOX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGVMX dropped -27.36% vs APFOX's -5.69%.

APFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.20 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGVMX and APFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer