FGUSX vs. TMPFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGUSX (Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund) and TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, FGUSX returned 4.67%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for TMPFX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FGUSX charges 0.26%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TMPFX.

Performance

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) and Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGUSX having a 1.49% return and TMPFX slightly higher at 1.52%.

FGUSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMPFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 2.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	1.49%	5.22%	4.67%	4.61%	0.33%
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund	1.52%	3.71%	4.26%	3.90%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FGUSX and TMPFX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022	-0.04

Return for Risk

FGUSX vs. TMPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUSX

FGUSX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FGUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FGUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) and Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGUSX	TMPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	6.81	-3.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	63.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGUSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is lower than the TMPFX Sharpe Ratio of 6.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGUSX and TMPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGUSX	TMPFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	6.81	-3.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.06	0.81	+2.25

Drawdowns

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGUSX drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum TMPFX drawdown of -3.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUSX and TMPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGUSX	TMPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-3.52%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	0.00%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.31%	-3.52%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.65%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.00%	+0.08%

Volatility

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) at 0.16%. This indicates that FGUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGUSX	TMPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	0.16%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.01%	0.39%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	0.56%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.57%	2.33%	-0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.57%	1.81%	-0.24%

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGUSX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than TMPFX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGUSX vs. TMPFX - Dividend Comparison

FGUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than TMPFX's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	4.37%	4.66%	4.56%	4.70%	0.33%
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund	3.75%	3.81%	4.15%	3.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGUSX and TMPFX in my portfolio?

FGUSX and TMPFX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGUSX or TMPFX?

FGUSX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to TMPFX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGUSX dropped -0.31% vs TMPFX's -3.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.81 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.