FGUSX vs. QILGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FGUSX (Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund) and QILGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FGUSX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Federated, while QILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 3 years, FGUSX returned 4.67%/yr vs 28.18%/yr for QILGX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGUSX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QILGX.

Performance

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGUSX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than QILGX's 8.43% return.

FGUSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QILGX

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 28.18%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: 20.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	1.49%	5.22%	4.67%	4.61%	0.33%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	8.43%	19.46%	40.83%	39.63%	0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FGUSX and QILGX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022	0.08

Return for Risk

FGUSX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUSX

FGUSX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FGUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FGUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

QILGX

QILGX Risk / Return Rank: 30
QILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
QILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
QILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGUSX	QILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	1.67	+1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.35	2.35	+8.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.31	1.34	+1.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.83	1.72	+14.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	63.52	5.55	+57.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGUSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the QILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGUSX and QILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGUSX	QILGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	1.67	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.06	0.60	+2.45

Drawdowns

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGUSX drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum QILGX drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUSX and QILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGUSX	QILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-53.48%	+53.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-15.55%	+15.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.31%	-24.71%	+24.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.05%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-1.19%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-8.96%	+8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	4.83%	-4.75%

Volatility

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) is 0.45%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FGUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGUSX	QILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	3.38%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.01%	13.04%	-12.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	16.04%	-14.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.57%	21.05%	-19.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.57%	21.25%	-19.68%

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGUSX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGUSX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison

FGUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than QILGX's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	4.37%	4.66%	4.56%	4.70%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	2.85%	3.09%	6.60%	1.47%	13.57%	19.44%	7.47%	5.07%	10.33%	7.40%	0.55%	11.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGUSX and QILGX in my portfolio?

FGUSX and QILGX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGUSX or QILGX?

QILGX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FGUSX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGUSX dropped -0.31% vs QILGX's -53.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.