FGUSX vs. CBUDX
FGUSX (Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund) and CBUDX (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, FGUSX returned 4.67%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for CBUDX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGUSX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for CBUDX.
Performance
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGUSX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CBUDX's 1.64% return.
FGUSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund | 1.49% | 5.22% | 4.67% | 4.61% | 0.33% |
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 1.64% | 5.25% | 5.83% | 5.61% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGUSX and CBUDX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between FGUSX and CBUDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGUSX vs. CBUDX — Risk / Return Rank
FGUSX
CBUDX
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGUSX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.15 | 3.87 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.48 | 10.85 | +4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.60 | 72.46 | -12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGUSX drawdown since its inception was -0.31%, smaller than the maximum CBUDX drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGUSX and CBUDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGUSX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.40% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.40% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.31% | -0.40% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.10% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.03% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.06% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) has a higher volatility of 0.39% compared to CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX) at 0.29%. This indicates that FGUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGUSX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.29% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.00% | 0.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44% | 0.85% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 0.92% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.56% | 0.92% | +0.64% |
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGUSX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUDX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGUSX vs. CBUDX - Dividend Comparison
FGUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than CBUDX's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 4.44% | 4.61% | 5.68% | 5.67% | 2.94% | 0.16% |
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund | 4.37% | 4.66% | 4.56% | 4.70% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGUSX and CBUDX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGUSX has higher volatility (0.39%) compared to CBUDX (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGUSX dropped -0.31% vs CBUDX's -0.40%.
CBUDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.11 vs 3.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGUSX and CBUDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer